| 淮投普法│玩忽職守犯罪系列：簽訂(ding)、履行(xing)合同失職被(bei)騙罪罪 ---本期導覽： 1.基本案情 2.罪名定義 3.量刑標準 4.法院審(shen)判 一、基本案情(qing)蔣某（承(cheng)包虹橋集團能源部,借用(yong)虹(hong)(hong)橋(qiao)(qiao)公(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)司(si)(si)名義(yi)開展業(ye)(ye)務）找(zhao)到時任(ren)國(guo)有(you)公(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)司(si)(si)大(da)(da)(da)唐(tang)物(wu)資公(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)司(si)(si)總經(jing)理的(de)(de)(de)被告人楊某(mou)(mou)和(he)設備材料部(bu)副主(zhu)任(ren)被告人李某(mou)(mou),謊(huang)稱(cheng)虹(hong)(hong)橋(qiao)(qiao)公(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)司(si)(si)是商(shang)(shang)務部(bu)下屬的(de)(de)(de)國(guo)有(you)企業(ye)(ye),提(ti)出以大(da)(da)(da)唐(tang)物(wu)資公(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)司(si)(si)為平臺采購(gou)銷售煤(mei)(mei)炭(tan)的(de)(de)(de)合(he)同(tong)模式,即(ji)以大(da)(da)(da)唐(tang)物(wu)資公(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)司(si)(si)名義(yi)采購(gou)煤(mei)(mei)炭(tan)轉售給虹(hong)(hong)橋(qiao)(qiao)公(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)司(si)(si),虹(hong)(hong)橋(qiao)(qiao)公(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)司(si)(si)再轉售給南方水泥(ni)公(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)司(si)(si),虹(hong)(hong)橋(qiao)(qiao)公(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)司(si)(si)支付大(da)(da)(da)唐(tang)物(wu)資公(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)司(si)(si)額外(wai)抽成利潤,上(shang)游(you)煤(mei)(mei)炭(tan)供應商(shang)(shang)及下游(you)煤(mei)(mei)炭(tan)采購(gou)商(shang)(shang)均由蔣某(mou)(mou)負責,大(da)(da)(da)唐(tang)物(wu)資公(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)司(si)(si)無需任(ren)何資金投入和(he)承(cheng)擔任(ren)何風險。李某(mou)(mou)上(shang)網查詢后,對蔣某(mou)(mou)的(de)(de)(de)介紹信以為真并向楊某(mou)(mou)匯報,楊某(mou)(mou)、李某(mou)(mou)在(zai)未嚴格審(shen)查虹(hong)(hong)橋(qiao)(qiao)公(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)司(si)(si)的(de)(de)(de)主(zhu)體資格、資信情(qing)況、履約(yue)能力等(deng)的(de)(de)(de)情(qing)況下,草率接受蔣某(mou)(mou)提(ti)出的(de)(de)(de)合(he)同(tong)模式并與虹(hong)(hong)橋(qiao)(qiao)公(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)司(si)(si)簽(qian)訂銷售煤(mei)(mei)炭(tan)合(he)同(tong)。 后來，蔣某以大唐物資公司(si)(si)名義從多家公司(si)(si)采購(gou)合同總金額(e)16155.91445萬(wan)元(yuan)的煤炭,同(tong)時以(yi)(yi)大(da)唐(tang)(tang)物資公(gong)(gong)(gong)司(si)(si)名義(yi)與(yu)虹(hong)(hong)橋公(gong)(gong)(gong)司(si)(si)簽訂煤炭銷售(shou)(shou)合同(tong),將(jiang)(jiang)煤炭貨(huo)權全部轉給虹(hong)(hong)橋公(gong)(gong)(gong)司(si)(si),并隨(sui)即將(jiang)(jiang)煤炭貨(huo)權出(chu)(chu)售(shou)(shou)得利轉移(yi)折抵債務。期(qi)間，李(li)某(mou)(mou)、楊某(mou)(mou)分別前(qian)往虹(hong)(hong)橋公(gong)(gong)(gong)司(si)(si)考(kao)察核實合同(tong)履行(xing)情況,蔣某(mou)(mou)謊稱(cheng)虹(hong)(hong)橋公(gong)(gong)(gong)司(si)(si)是國有企業(ye),資金實力雄(xiong)厚,以(yi)(yi)大(da)唐(tang)(tang)物資公(gong)(gong)(gong)司(si)(si)名義(yi)采(cai)購(gou)的煤炭經過虹(hong)(hong)橋公(gong)(gong)(gong)司(si)(si)轉手已經出(chu)(chu)售(shou)(shou)給南方水泥公(gong)(gong)(gong)司(si)(si),隱瞞煤炭已被實際轉移(yi)的真(zhen)(zhen)相,騙取大(da)唐(tang)(tang)物資公(gong)(gong)(gong)司(si)(si)信任以(yi)(yi)繼續履行(xing)合作協議。楊某(mou)(mou)、李(li)某(mou)(mou)僅聽(ting)取蔣某(mou)(mou)口頭介紹、言語承諾(nuo),未(wei)認真(zhen)(zhen)考(kao)察虹(hong)(hong)橋公(gong)(gong)(gong)司(si)(si),未(wei)認真(zhen)(zhen)核實合同(tong)履行(xing)及貨(huo)物交易情況。虹(hong)(hong)橋公(gong)(gong)(gong)司(si)(si)于向(xiang)大(da)唐(tang)(tang)物資公(gong)(gong)(gong)司(si)(si)支付(fu)煤炭貨(huo)款(kuan)及額外抽成利潤共計1500萬(wan)元(yuan),大(da)唐(tang)(tang)物資公(gong)(gong)(gong)司(si)(si)向(xiang)上(shang)游(you)銷售(shou)(shou)企業(ye)支付(fu)煤炭貨(huo)款(kuan)1400萬(wan)元(yuan),尚欠(qian)銷售(shou)(shou)企業(ye)共計14755.91445萬(wan)元(yuan)。 另查明,依據大(da)(da)唐物(wu)資公(gong)(gong)司(si)《重大(da)(da)事項決策實施細(xi)則》規(gui)定,重大(da)(da)項目的安排(pai)和大(da)(da)額資金使用(yong),必(bi)須經公(gong)(gong)司(si)黨(dang)政聯席會集體(ti)討論通過后,方(fang)可(ke)按(an)(an)照公(gong)(gong)司(si)合同(tong)(tong)管理(li)(li)程序執(zhi)(zhi)行(xing)。被告(gao)人(ren)楊某作為公(gong)(gong)司(si)總經理(li)(li),沒(mei)有按(an)(an)照規(gui)定提議召(zhao)開會議,沒(mei)有對上(shang)(shang)述(shu)重大(da)(da)合同(tong)(tong)簽(qian)訂進行(xing)討論,擅(shan)自做主,被告(gao)人(ren)李某具體(ti)負責(ze)上(shang)(shang)述(shu)合同(tong)(tong)的簽(qian)訂、履行(xing)。依據大(da)(da)唐公(gong)(gong)司(si)及上(shang)(shang)級(ji)單(dan)位(wei)的相關規(gui)定,大(da)(da)唐物(wu)資公(gong)(gong)司(si)簽(qian)訂該類(lei)合同(tong)(tong),需要(yao)上(shang)(shang)報上(shang)(shang)級(ji)單(dan)位(wei)報備審批(pi)后方(fang)可(ke)執(zhi)(zhi)行(xing),上(shang)(shang)述(shu)被騙合同(tong)(tong)在簽(qian)訂過程中,均未按(an)(an)規(gui)定上(shang)(shang)報報備審批(pi),而是(shi)由被告(gao)人(ren)楊某擅(shan)自做主,由李某直接與蔣某控(kong)制的虹橋(qiao)公(gong)(gong)司(si)簽(qian)訂合同(tong)(tong)。 二、罪名定義第(di)一(yi)百(bai)六十七條 【簽(qian)(qian)訂、履行(xing)合同(tong)失(shi)職(zhi)被(bei)騙(pian)罪】國有(you)公司、企(qi)業、事業單位(wei)直(zhi)接負(fu)責(ze)的(de)主(zhu)管人(ren)員，在簽(qian)(qian)訂、履行(xing)合同(tong)過程(cheng)中，因(yin)嚴重不(bu)負(fu)責(ze)任(ren)被(bei)詐騙(pian)，致使國家利益遭受重大(da)損失(shi)的(de)，是簽(qian)(qian)訂、履行(xing)合同(tong)失(shi)職(zhi)被(bei)騙(pian)罪。 三、量刑標準第一百六十七(qi)條 犯簽(qian)訂、履行合同失(shi)職被騙罪的，致(zhi)使國(guo)家(jia)利(li)益遭受(shou)重大(da)損失的，處三年以下(xia)有期(qi)徒(tu)刑或(huo)者拘役(yi);致使國家利益遭受特別重大損失的，處三年以上七年以下有期徒刑。 四、法(fa)院審(shen)判被(bei)告人(ren)楊某、李某作為國有企業直(zhi)接負責的主(zhu)管人(ren)員,在簽訂、履行合(he)同(tong)過程中,因嚴重(zhong)不(bu)負(fu)責任導致企業被詐(zha)騙14755.91445萬元,致使國家利益遭受(shou)特別重(zhong)大(da)損失,構成簽訂、履行合(he)同(tong)失職被騙罪(zui)。 鑒于被告人(ren)李某歸案(an)后如實供述主要犯罪事實,是坦(tan)白,依法可從(cong)輕處(chu)(chu)罰。判決:被(bei)告(gao)人(ren)楊某犯(fan)簽(qian)(qian)訂(ding)、履行合同(tong)失職被(bei)騙罪(zui),判處(chu)(chu)有(you)期(qi)徒刑(xing)四(si)年三個月；被(bei)告(gao)人(ren)李某犯(fan)簽(qian)(qian)訂(ding)、履行合同(tong)失職被(bei)騙罪(zui),判處(chu)(chu)有(you)期(qi)徒刑(xing)三年。
|
